Wednesday, February 13, 2013

NEW JAMES BRANCH CABELL WEBSITE

A new website for the American master of ornate and ironic fantasy, James Branch Cabell, author of Jurgen and The Cream of the Jest has just been launched: The Silver Stallion. It is still in development but with a number of features already live. The website plans to offer:

- A revised, updated and illustrated bibliography of James Branch Cabell's works
- A revised and updated bibliography of works about James Branch Cabell
- A picture gallery
- Notes and essays on Cabell and related topics
- Reprints from the classic Cabell journals "Kalki" and "The Cabellian"
- Book reviews
- A discussion forum
- Collector's Corner
- Letters to the editor
- Links to Cabell-related sites on the internet
- and more...

The website is a collaborative effort, staffed entirely by volunteers, that welcomes comments and contributions from readers.

Once highly popular, and controversial, in the Nineteen Twenties and after, Cabell enjoyed a revival in the adult fantasy publishing of the Nineteen Sixties and Seventies, when some of his books were reprinted by Pan Ballantine. But he has perhaps been somewhat more in the shadows in recent times, and the website provides a very welcome new focus and forum for his work.

Friday, January 25, 2013

IN THE SHADOW OF SHERLOCK HOLMES: R Austin Freeman's Dr Thorndyke

Who is second to Sherlock Holmes as a detective ? Who is second to Arthur Conan Doyle as a writer of detective fiction ? Two rather different questions, but both sure to be warmly debated. However, for many, the answers are clear. Dr Thorndyke of the Middle Temple, the expert in “medical jurisprudence”, is very close to the great man in his attention to detail, his calm reasoning, and his flashes of ingenuity. And his creator, Richard Austin Freeman, is the eternal vice-captain in the team of great crime writers of the Golden Age.

Freeman was born in London in 1862, and one of the incidental pleasures of his books is the way they explore the many forgotten streets, squares and courtyards of the capital. Like Dickens (a favourite writer of his) before him, and like Freeman’s contemporary, Arthur Machen, he evokes the by-ways of the great city so well, it is almost like a character itself in many of his books. From fairly humble beginnings – his father was a tailor and his mother a dressmaker – Freeman gained a medical qualification and secured a colonial appointment as a doctor in West Africa. Fever drove him back to Britain when he was aged thirty and for a while it wasn’t clear what he would do next. Strikingly like Conan Doyle, he served as a locum doctor and used his ample spare time - when patients were unreasonably healthy - to write short stories.

In around thirty books, from The Red Thumb Mark of 1907 to The Jacob Street Mystery of 1942, Freeman brought a strong imagination to bear. Nearly all his cases feature the eminent Dr Thorndyke, whose investigations allow Freeman full rein to demonstrate his shrewd plotting and strong sense of the possibilities of forensic science, long before this was widely practised.

He is also notable for his willingness to innovate in the field of crime fiction. Freeman was one of the first, with The Singing Bone (1912), to deploy the “inverted” crime story. The reader knows who the murderer is from the outset, and the pleasure is in seeing how he can possibly be uncovered. This was an audacious move, but it’s generally recognised that Freeman makes it work. “The interest focuses on the unexpected significance of trivial circumstances,” he explained, and he recommended that the reader should pause after all the facts are laid out, to assess these. I am not so sure myself that this vicarious sleuthing is always the real interest of his tales though. I think he under-estimates his own skill at creating a sinister atmosphere, and the reader’s enjoyment of the lofty omniscience of Dr Thorndyke.

Another of his innovations was to tell the story from the standpoint of the villain, as in The Exploits of Danby Croker (1916). Though most crime fiction is written from the side of law and order, in fact Freeman found that the reader can also enjoy seeing a roguish character get away with it. Of course, E.W. Hornung had done that with the Raffles stories, but Freeman brings great gusto to his bounders and reprobates.

Freeman’s career began, in fact, with just such a character. Under the pseudonym of Clifford Ashdown, a name that disguised a collaboration with Dr J J Pitcairn (a prison surgeon he assisted in one of his temporary posts), he published in 1902 The Adventures of Romney Pringle. His hero – if that’s quite the right word – is in theory a literary agent but actually a consummate con man – if such a distinction is possible. A second series was published in Cassell’s Magazine in 1904 (though not collected in book form until 1969). Alas, something seems to have happened to mar his friendship with Pitcairn. Freeman was soon writing on his own, and under his own name, and Romney Pringle was heard of no more.

It’s some consolation, though, that in his place Freeman gave us his magisterial Dr Thorndyke. By making him both a qualified medical man and a barrister, Freeman gives his detective a highly advantageous set of skills and qualities for the investigation of crime. He is ably assisted by his Watson, Dr Christopher Jervis, by a solicitor, Mr Brodribb, who sometimes introduces cases to him, and by his factotum, Mr Polton – a craftsman in all things of the laboratory or workshop. The latter is essential to Thorndyke’s work, because, throughout the many novels and stories recounting his cases, Thorndyke makes great practical use of scientific experiments, for example with hair, shreds of clothing, soil, anything in fact that might yield up secrets invisible to the naked eye. It has been claimed that in many of these Freeman was actually ahead of the real detectives of his day, and that the methods Thorndyke deploys were taken seriously and studied by the Surete and Scotland Yard.

And there is no doubt Freeman saw this detailed analytical work as being at the heart of his stories. “The Detective Story differs from all other forms of fiction in that its interest is primarily intellectual,” he asserted. He conceded (perhaps a little grudgingly) that “emotion, dramatic action, humour, pathos, “love interest”” might also be allowed, but as “mere accessory factors”.

Some critics, conversely, have thought that all this scrutiny with scientific apparatus can give the books a cold, clinical air, and that the excitement of genius – such as one feels in the presence of Holmes – is missing from his more ponderous rival. But this is mostly unfair. Perhaps occasionally, some of the analytical detail is a little too minutely described. Yet most of the time it is briskly done, throws light on interesting subjects, and seems to the lay reader entirely sound. And Freeman often infuses Thorndyke with human warmth and a determination to aid the distressed and perplexed that counter-balances all this hard logic.

Freeman was also clear that the author must play fair with the reader and laid out three rules to ensure this: “1. The problem must be susceptible of at least approximate solution b y the reader; 2. The solution…must be absolutely conclusive and convincing; 3. No material fact must be withheld from the reader. All the cards must be honestly laid on the table…”. How many detective writers consistently obey all those ?

Perhaps his first great success was with The Eye of Osiris (1911), an excellent mystery involving a museum, a missing Professor, and a mummy, still highly-regarded today. The novel caught the imagination of readers who were in thrall to the exotic symbols and magical allure of ancient Egypt, which authors such as Bram Stoker (The Jewel of the Seven Stars), H. Rider Haggard (Cleopatra, etc), and Sax Rohmer (The Green Eyes of Bast and others) had fostered.

Another highly regarded novel is Mr Pottermack’s Oversight (1930), which makes excellent use of Freeman’s two unconventional techniques I mentioned earlier: the ‘inverted’ story, and sympathy with the villain. In this case, Mr Pottermack is being blackmailed. He does away with his persecutor, as the reader finds out very early on, and uses an ingenious device to quite literally lay a false trail. So – we know who the murderer is, and how he did it. But our interest is wonderfully sustained as we watch how Thorndyke uncovers his deception, even though we almost don’t want him to.

Undoubtedly one of the most startlingly bizarre of his books is For the Defence: Dr Thorndyke (1934), in which an innocent young man ends up (through an extraordinary set of incidents) standing trial for murdering himself. The book takes astonishing liberties with the laws of coincidence, but somehow the reader still has to keep on with the book, slack-jawed at the author’s impudence. I’ve often wondered if Freeman did it for a bet, if only with himself .

Freeman went on producing a new crime novel at roughly the rate of one a year – indeed, some dustwrappers actually announced it as if it were a regular annual event – “Mr Freeman’s 1930 Novel”. It’s fair to say that he always maintained a sound standard, though some critics sense the later titles strain at the possibilities a little. Also, perhaps understandably, he seems to have lost the appetite to innovate, and we remain in the essentially Edwardian world of his first books.

So, by the time of Freeman’s death in September 1943 at Gravesend, Kent, the place he had made his home for nearly 40 years, his fame had faded a little. That Golden Age atmosphere was no longer so much in demand. But over time, collectors began to rediscover his work and appreciate anew how satisfying it is. It is fair to say that a good half-dozen of Freeman’s books ought to be in every connoisseur’s crime fiction collection. But the true savant will want to track them all down.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Vincent Cornier, The Cherraton Cat

Vincent Cornier (1898-1976), the last name on the list posted below, is a writer I'm unfamiliar with.  A quick Google stalk revealed Mike Ashley had edited a collection of his crime stories, The Duel of Shadows, in 2011, featuring the detective Barnabas Hildreth.  Evidently he was born Vincent Corner in northern England and at some point changed his name to Cornier, perhaps to lend himself a more exotic ring.  I'm not sure if the following story, pulled from a Queensland newspaper, has ever been reprinted, but I can't resist an evil cat tale, especially one that threatens the future of civilisation.


THE CHERRATON CAT

Vincent Cornier
Townsville Daily Bulletin, 4 August 1936

As Jeff Bagster, out-of-work laborer turned poacher, morosely wove his way out of the cool vaults of Cherraton Woods, he cursed his Ill-luck vehemently. Twenty-six wires set and only two rabbits to show; another night without drink down at the Tun and Fork Arms. He could not understand it. For the third time he had drawn blank, and the woods were alive with rabbits and runs were new and clean, for it was late May.

So it came about, because his wits were sharpened by the mystery of the matter that when he heard the measured and scuffling sound behind the dry-set stone wall which formed the southern-most boundary of the woodlands, be slowed about and ran like something possessed toward that noise. Now he knew the reason for his miserable hauls. He realised in a sudden access of dull anger, what he should have recognised a week before — a cat had been at work in Cherraton Woods.

The scuffling noise beyond the wall could not be caused by anything other than a cat caught in a snare. To a poacher that sound of grim and dour battle with the strangling noose always betrayed the cat. A rabbit would have made spasmodic scutterings, might have shrilled; would most certainly have caused that distinctive 'crack-k-k' to arise from the rubbing of its long back legs on grassy earth; a hare would have bleated or drummed— a cat, only a cat, fights with the calculating and dogged, persistence of a man against death. With every muscle taunted, it fights measuredly, adroitly, intelligently; hence, sometimes successfully, when caught in a noose.

This one, as Bagster saw on leaping the wall, had nearly freed itself. The knot in the wire had prevented it from being strangled, and although its eyes were almost starting from its head, it was grimly scratching a trough by the side of the snare-peg, that piece of hazel-wood which held it bonded to the earth.

Jeff Bagster gasped a little when he saw that cat. He gasped and gulped and faltered in his vengeful stride. He had never seen a beast like this before. It was a gaunt grey Tom, with a head which had the wide flat arch of a mild domestic pet allied to the lean and sinister, gurnard-boned muzzle of the wild cat. Its bristle tail was like a flue brush of sepia and silver-grey hair and quivering muscles rippled madly down its two feet six inches length of spine, as wind under pegged-down canvas. The oddness of the build of the cat was quite sufficient to halt a man at gaze, but there was something more.

Bagster gasped again and swore softly to the sudden silence that had come since the trapped beast had ceased from struggling. The “blooming thing was like a breath o’ Hell,” he told himself.  Yes, that was it, a heavy and nauseating odour came up from it — a musky breath, as of old leather-bound books decaying in a wet attic . . . “like rotten parsnips on a muck heap,” was Bagster's cruder, but possibly apter, simile. It was not an acid, ammoniac or foetid smell, not a cat stench— it was something slow and penetrating and sickly-sweet-sour and horrible; something that Bagster had not known.

He regained composure — “Y' daman’ thing,” he apostrophised the repulsive beast that was watching him so balefully out of jasper eyes. “Tha't a-gettin' t'rabbuds, hasta-a? Weel— that's goin' t’ get summat else nah; tha's going’ t' get y'neck thrawn, sitha! That for ye— ye fahl beast ye! I'll gie thee nobble t'rabbuds!'' Then he was puzzled. He dared not use the folding 28-bore gun that lay so snugly within his flapping coat— that noise would alarm. He dared not to strike at the cat with a stick, nor a stone, nor yet to kick at it. He knew, from a long poaching experience of too many supremely convulsive leaps — away from such obvious deaths — on the part of trapped cats; releasing both cat and snarepeg as well; go to free a destined quarry. No, there was only one way to deal with that cat; he'd have to go behind it and grab it by the scruff of the neck, and . . . well, he'd see to further details in the grim business, once having the beast impotent In his grasp. So, he dived for the loose nape of its thick and bristling neck . . . and missed!

A. searing pain burst and leapt about his hand as teeth and claws sank into it like molten metal into butter. He yelled in agony and felt the hot saliva of the maddened thing stinging like acid on the new wounds. Then the great cat twisted —once— twice . . . snapped the long fretted brass wire of the snare, and was free. Free— and it did not run for the dim green safety of the woods, it stopped there, in the primrose radiance of the sunny field of young wheat— turned about; dropped belly low to earth, crouched, snarled, spat . . . and tensed itself to spring on the horrified human whom, already, it had mastered! For one wild moment Jeff Bagster had the rotting parsnip smell of the hideous thing in his nostrils; for one mad space in time he swayed with dizzy horror and blinding pain — he clearly saw the maroon patches about the fanged and hissing mouth of the beast and knew that he looked at the stainings of his own blood — then- he sobbed and turned and ran.

Reckless of the young wheat, regardless alike of farmer, hind and keepers, he blundered across the uneven field, moaning with fear and crying futile little words of prayer and profanity— ran down the hillside to the road by the river which cut the valley atwain, two hundred feet below. And the great cat went after him like a tiger!

It savaged him three times before he gained that road. It tore his left leg; clambered to his shoulders and bit at the back of his neck — clawed an ear almost to ribbons, for all that he had fought it as he would a demon. He crashed through the hedge into the sunken road and lay there, bleeding and excoriated by teeth and claw and briar, sweating, foaming; blinded by an orange glow of blood-mad fear— to all seeming, demented . . . And the gaunt grey incubus that was the cat slipped like a horrible shadow away. At 11 o'clock that same night, only seven hours after the strange affray, Jeff Bagster died. A bellowing, raving thing of agony and twisting limbs, lost to all semblance of man, he died— and— he went green-black about the horror that had been his face, when he was dead.
-
At 1 o'clock in the morning Sir Lionel Cowperthwaite— that famous specialist of international renown, who lived in studious retirement at Cherraton Grange— was sent for by the village medico to see the terrible corpse that so recently had been Bagster. Sir Lionel took one glimpse at its awful mask; looked once into the eyes of the clammily fearful Doctor Redshaw; called brokenly on his God— and lumbered out of the cottage doorway into the moonlit street as would a very drunken man.

It was the astounded talk of the village, some hours later in that already born day of mystery, that the baronet was observed by at least three keepers to be prowling about Cherraton wood from soon after leaving Bagster's cottage to broad dawn. One who had watched his movements carefully stated that he carried an automatic pistol in his hand, and, as he scoured the undergrowth from tree to tree he was choking out a monotonous and despairing sound which was suspiciously akin to dry and tearless sobbing ; he muttered, brokenly and savagely the while.

What had he said? Had the keeper, by any chance, heard what he said? , . . Oh, yes, the keeper had: “That cat— that hellish thing to come upon the world ... O God! . . . forgive me — that, cat!” Those were some of the wild phrases that great physician, Sir Lionel Cowperthwaite, had given to the moon-flushed silence of the wood of Cherraton, as might an imbecile have muttered. No one could understand ....

The post mortem on Jeff Bagster, conducted in his cottage up on the moor's edge, was a fearful and guarded affair. Six doctors came to attend it and all were keen, elderly and “substantial-looking” men drawn from London. When it all was over there was a conference between them, at the Grange, with Sir Lionel and Doctor Redshaw added to their number.

The simple verdict which followed on the simpler inquest — that of “death from misadventure”— gave rise to a profound distrust in the collective mind of a suddenly and ominously silent village. For by this it was common knowledge that the police and the coroner had summoned the County Health Officer to attend—the six doctors had spent an hour or so in sending coded telegrams half over England — and an ambulance from the isolation hospital, fifteen miles away, waited outside the police station for orders.

Something tremendous in its secrecy was afoot, opined the villagers of Cherraton. They were right! Events moved with baffling; rapidity no sooner was the verdict given.

A special train arrived at the light railway station and from it was removed a coffin. This, a heavy leaden shell (the stationmaster, awed, told that) was taken to the cottage that was Bagster's. The remains were placed in it— the cottage sealed and guarded by the police.

A hurried summons from the parish clerk— a flying to and fro of hired cars, and, before the afternoon was spent a secret meeting of the parish council had been held .... with strange results. The crowd saw a few white-faced, silent councillors emerge from the village institute; saw them shake hands solemnly with the imported medicos; saw them leave for their homes looking like men already doomed to death themselves . . . Then, within the hour, the lead-encased thing that had been Bagster was taken from the cottage and pushed aboard the waiting train.

Six silent doctors entered that special — and, away it went. This was all the village ever knew of Bagster's resting place!

Mrs. Wooton, the old woman who had attended on the poacher's last pitiful needs, was taken from the village in the motor ambulance. Her destination was the Isolation hospital—her cottage, adjoining that of Bagster's, was closed.

And, strangely enough, those two isolated cottages up on the moor's fringe caught fire that selt-same night, and, stranger still, for the first time in Its long history the village was not served in its emergency by the local fire brigades. Call after frenzied call was sent . . . never an engine arrived!

Both cottages were ashes to their foundations within two hours. Then came a fear on Cherraton.

That all took place on the Friday. On Saturday morning the Earl of Marletonways, High Sheriff of the county, paid a visit to Sir Lionel at the Grange. The inspector of Cherraton police, the Health Officer, and most of the Guardians and Council attended a meeting held at that place behind locked and guarded doors. The Earl went away—the villagers were more fearful still; they had seen his face as he passed by.

On Monday Lord Cherraton, the squire, unexpectedly returned from abroad and gave out that he would be in residence at the Hall for an indefinite period throughout the summer. The return, although a source of satisfaction to village tradesmen and an army of “outside” domestics, was a thing of mystery. More mysterious still was the amazing episode that followed!

All the day long, gamekeepers, hinds, laborers and even poachers, most of them known in Cherraton as being tenants or servants of surrounding great estates— poured into Cherraton to find lodgings in the village. Then, on the evening train a company of soldiers, nearly a hundred strong, arrived! They formed up and marched their way to the Hall, to find, in its huge outbuildings, billets already prepared for them!

Cherraton seethed; Cherraton gasped; Cherraton chattered and argued and swore— until a gamekeeper, one of the recent arrivals gave a secret while in his cups down at the Tun and Fork Inn: “What are we 'ere for? Y’ need ask! We've gotten a 'undred pound job on 'and, me boy! Think on it— a 'undred blinkin' quid! An' all we've gotten to do t'earn all that brass - is t’ cop a big grey cat! Money for nowt lads — sup up!”

All Cherraton knew on Tuesday morning. That gaunt grey cat had to be caugh.t A hundred pounds was the reward for its body. Over all the vast Cherraton estate rights of privacy were to be waived. No action for trespass would be taken against anyone who, legitimately, was out to kill that cat. All damage would be made good to tenant farmers by Lord Cherraton's steward ... the soldiers would take to beating coverts the next day. Every one capable of handling a gun was invited to join in the long line of gamekeepers, who were to move back with that beating line .... the village turned out to a man!

Only one proviso was made; only one warning given .... under no circumstances had anyone to touch that cat alive or dead! What plan would be made for the removal of its carcass would be made by the police and the Medical Officer of Health, at the proper time.

All of which strangely mediaeval procedure alarmed and intrigued those wariest of mortals— pressmen. In a body they descended on Cherraton, eager and athirst for details. The villagers supplied them; the reporters reported— ecstatically, for this was a story of stories! Yet, not one line of all their effusions was published! On the contrary summary recalls were received by each of them. And, in several newspaper offices a few hours later those chagrined men sought interviews with their respective news editors .... What they learned was sufficient to send them, white-faced and shaking, away— hoping that they would never hear the name of Cherraton again - imbued by a horror of cats — wondering if it was soon to come about that the proud march of civilisation was to revert to where it was in the dim and unenlightened years of the sixteenth century. And because it dealth with human fools; because those blind humans beat the ground, forgetting that the cat that is wild takes to the topmost turrets of the trees .... the grinning, basilisk-eyed horror that was the Cherraton cat, went free.
-
On the Friday following Jeff Bagster's death, the blackened body of a little child, one Evelyn Holmes, was discovered lying by the river side. In her pitiful grasp she held a few wilted wild flowers and down her little face ran a green-edge scar —that of a cat's scratch. The half eaten remains of a two-pound chubb lay in the river reeds before her and in the compost of silver sand and mud between the reeds and the water's edge were the imprints of the paws of the Cherraton cat.

The story was simply told— the little girl picking for her posy, had disturbed the awful beast when it was eating the fish it had clawed out of the shallows ... she had died within a few moments, even as Bagster had died

They say that this, the second death, was the cause of Sir Lionel Cowperthwaite's madness .... but, knowing everything, was he so very mad, after all? For this is what took' place:

When the moon was low down across the water, the baronet walked his slow, set way along the river bank on which Evelyn's Holmes's body had been found.

So the beast— he pondered— had been forced to an existence which meant its contact with water? He knew cats — once having tasted fish (as a tiger with human flesh) it would not eat anything else ... so as he walked, he acted strangely.

To the right and to the left of him, along the riverside pathway, he flung tiny sponges, impregnated by some powerful and loathly scent. Beneath the instep of his boots, two other — bigger— sponges were tied. Where he walked was one long line of bitter stench ... the cat came after it.

There In the yellow moon glow, gambolling like a kitten, snarling with strange, sensuous pleasure, arching its back, bounding off the ground by impulse of some wildly exhilarating ecstacy— the great and sinister form of the Cherraton cat went after Sir Lionel Cowperthwaite.

When it found a little sponge it rolled on it and snuggled it between paws and muzzle, and, when it did so, it cried tinily to itself, as would a baby ... for always the mingled scents of the strangely voluptuous essence and that of human prey receded from it. It must follow all its aroused instinctive reason told it — it must follow ... it followed.

Sir Lionel waited for its oncoming by the deepest green-black shadow of an alder. He shivered a little as he saw its eyes gleaming acid green in the long, low violet glow from off the moonlit waters and the dewing grass. And he muttered in his throat a prayer for strength as he glimpsed its huge and sinuous body gliding across the path, beaten hard by the river bank.

It was on him: it touched him . . . and it nestled like a kitten about his redolent boots, purring!

Very cautiously, crooning to it the while, he lowered his hands and took it by its sinewy throat . . .
-
The Minister faced the Earl of Marltonways across the solemn grandeur of that chamber set high above the clamor of Whitehall.

“So you think the danger is past?” he smoothly questioned.

“I'm certain,” answered Marltonways, “absolutely certain that it is —thank God!”

“Amen to that,” said the Minister.

It was a strange story to which he had been listening. He was satisfied now that he had been right in acting so swiftly when those first dread advices from Cherraton so agitated his department. He knew that an awful peril had been averted, and was glad.

“To think of it,” he had murmured to Marltonways a few moments earlier, “in this enlightened twentieth century of ours; what a cataclysmic blow it would have dealt .... to think of it.”

Sir Lionel Cowperthwaite had formed a startling theory while engaged in research work 15 years previously. Recognising that one of the oldest scourges of mankind— the bubonic plague— had died out with the extinction of the old English black rat he began to think of cats in relation to a (comparatively speaking) more modern horror: the Black Death, which ravaged the shires in mediaeval times.

From certain fragments of bone, discovered in museums; from partially mummified remains taken from Irish bogs; from old descriptions, prints and drawings, Cowperthwalte was brought to the point of realising that the cat of mediaeval days was a kind of physical halt between the huge and sinister beast which was worshipped as a god in ancient Egypt and in Crote, and the fine boned, pleasantly domestic bundle of fur and purring ways that modern households know. He further recognised that, with the advent of the modern type of cat, the old wild cat of England automatically died out . . . there was a distinct connection in the two sets of circumstances.

He set to work! It took him ten of those fifteen years of research —but— be resurrected, by a system of carefully regulated back-breeding, the mediaeval cat— the Cherraton cat.

Having obtained the specimens, he inoculated it with filter-passing organisms giving rise to the comparatively innocuous modem “plague”. . . within the Cherraton cat's great frame those millions of seeds of death were advanced to a potent maturity and— the Black Death was reborn on earth.

Then the horror of a cat escaped and took to the woods “carrier” of the most dreadful disease of ancient times!

Jeff Bagster and Evelyn Holmes both died of the Black Death after having been bitten by the beast. Sir Lionel Cowpurthwaite himself— died of the Black Death.

Remembering the partiality of the feline species for that madly intoxicating drug, valerian, Sir Lionel had soaked his sponges in the essence and had gone out to his doom, and to draw the cat also to death.

“Such a pity that Cowperthwaite died, the way he did,” Marltonways sighed, “such, a brain— such a brain! A grave loss to humanity, sir! But he was a brave man and squared his account.”

Thriller serials in the Weekly Times in the 1930s

Australian newspapers are a surprisingly useful source of serials and short stories by popular authors during the heyday of British thrillers and mysteries in the 1930s.  Following is a list of two part serials (presumably heavily abridged) that appeared in the Weekly Times in the later years of the 1930s.  The Weekly Times is a Victorian rural newspaper, now owned by News Limited (like most Australian newspapers), which first appeared in 1859 and for many years had a large fiction section. The information is drawn from advertisements for WT that appeared in the Hobart Mercury.

Max Dalman: The Hidden Light
Rex Dark: Murder in Berkeley Square
Mark Hansom: Beasts of Brahm, Master of Souls
J. Jefferson Farjeon: Dark Lady, Yellow Devil, The Confusing Friendship
John Kent: Give Me Liberty
Arthur Russell: The Treasure Hunt, The Tragedy of the Strolling Players
John C. Woodiwiss: Ebony Torso
Edgar Jepson: The Woman From Nowhere
Russell Stannard: The Amateur Queen
Mary Howard: Autocrat's Island
Ruby Doyle: Inheritance
C.T. Podmore: The Three Strange Men
Nellie M. Scanlan, Tides of Youth, Pencarrow
J.R. Wilmot: Night Tide
Eardley Beswick: The Lorry Lady
Rowan Glen: The Singer From the Hills
Otwell Binns: The Poisoned Pen
Alroy West: Messengers of Death
John Hunter: House of Whispers
G.H. Teed: The Shadow Crook
Bentley Ridge: Well of Gold
Pierre Quiroule: At Midnight
Guy Thorne: The Fanshawe Murder
Ranger Gull (ie Guy Thorne): Ravenscroft Horror
Carlton Dawe: Live Cartridge
Ben Bolt: Masked Danger
Edgar Roberts: Murder at High Noon
E. Charles Vivian: Man Alone
Louis Brittany: Hand of Vengeance
E. Phillip Oppenheim: Jeremiah and the Princess, Stolen Idols
Vincent Cornier: Sinister Inheritance

Thursday, December 20, 2012

FAUNUS, THE ARTHUR MACHEN JOURNAL

The new issue of the Arthur Machen journal, Faunus, has just been issued to members of the Friends of Arthur Machen. Issue 26 of the hardback journal  includes Thomas Kent Miller's comprehensive survey of the meanings of Machen's enigmatic story 'N'; John Howard's explorations of a key Machen motif, geographical and spiritual boundaries; Godfrey Brangham's recollections of browsing for Machen in obscure bookshops; and an unpublished essay on Machen by the Nineties authority Derek Stanford. There's also an essay on a vituperative feud against Machen by the Edwardian journal The New Age, together with a previously undiscovered portrait of Machen in the futurist style. Accompanying Faunus, Gwil Games' Machenalia newsletter has the usual cornucopia of Machenesque news and announcements, including details of events planned to mark his 150th anniversary next year. To join the Friends of Arthur Machen and receive the journal and newsletter, please visit the Friends of Arthur Machen website.

R.R. Ryan

In 2004 Theo Pajmans and I published an article in All Hallows about the 1930s thriller writer, R.R. Ryan.  We revealed the existence of the book contracts for R.R. Ryan in the archive at Random House.  The contracts indicated that, in addition to the seven novels that he published under his own name, R.R. Ryan wrote four novels under two pseudonyms, Cameron Carr and John Galton.  At that time Random House would not release any personal information about Ryan for privacy reasons, so we were unable to establish the identity of the author, though we suggested a couple of possibilities, the actor Cameron Carr, and Rachel R. Ryan, who wrote a book about the city of Manchester in the 1930s.

In 2008, Random House agreed to release the personal information in the contracts in response to an access request.  All of the books are contracted to R.R. Ryan of 16 Granville Road, Hove, Sussex, except No Escape, Ryan’s last novel, which is addressed to 80B Lansdowne Place, Hove, Sussex.  The contract for No Escape is dated 17 November 1939.

A letter dated 3 March 1939 indicates that R.R. Ryan accepted an offer assigning copyright for all three names to Herbert Jenkins, now controlled by Random House.

The last correspondence in the R.R. Ryan file is a letter from Mrs Anne Ryan, R.R. Ryan’s wife, dated 1 August 1956.  The letter is addressed from 80B Lansdowne Place.  The letter appears to be a response to a letter dated 30 July 1956, which is not extant. In the letter Mrs Ryan accepts an offer made by Herbert Jenkins, but it is not clear for what, though it is conceivable the offer is for the copyright of No Escape, which was contracted after Ryan sold the copyrights of his other books to Jenkins in March 1939.

The Hove electoral registers reveal that a man named Rex Ryan lived at the Hove addresses with his wife, Anne.  Local directories confirm that the Ryans lived at these addresses.  Mrs A. Ryan is listed in Pike’s Directory for 1939-40 at 16 Granville Road.  Kelly’s Directory for 1947 and 1951 lists Mrs R Ryan at 80B Lansdowne Place, and lists Mrs A. Ryan at the same address for 1964 and 1966.

There is only one Rex Ryan listed in the UK Death Indexes for the period 1939-1956; he died at Hove, aged 67, in the last quarter of 1950.  His death certificate confirms that he was in fact R.R. Ryan.   His occupation is given as “retired theatrical manager and author”.  He was “found dead eighteenth October 1950 80B Lansdowne Place, Hove”.  The cause of death is given as “asphyxia due to carbon monoxide poisoning following inhalation of coal gas.  His own act. Suicide whilst the balance of his mind was disturbed.” 

The most intriguing detail of all comes under his name:

“Evelyn BRADLEY otherwise Rex RYAN”



Evelyn Bradley who was born in Waterloo, Lancashire on 14 December 1882.  His birth certificate was registered in September 1883.  He was the son of Walter Bradley, described in the 1891 census as a retired African merchant, who was born in about 1849, and Alison Bradley, born in about 1857.  Evelyn had two siblings, Arnold and Norah.  The 1891 census also lists Mary Webster, a school governess, as living with the family.  In that year the family were living in Cheadle in Cheshire; the 1901 census has the family living in Ripponden in Yorkshire.

Evelyn Bradley was a theatre manager, actor, and playwright, and his knowledge of the theatre appears in his books; a number of his protagonists are actors or aspiring actors, there are frequent theatrical references in his books, and A New Face at the Door, under his Cameron Carr pseudonym, concerns the members of a repertory company in a provincial theatre. 

Bradley’s plays included titles such as Yellow Vengeance, The Trap and The Volga Boatman.  The former is mentioned in Steve Nicholson’s The Censorship of British Drama 1900-1968 (2003-5):

In November 1928, [Lord Cromer, the Lord Chamberlain, who was responsible for theatre censorship in Britain until 1968] licensed Yellow Vengeance, in which Wong Koo, a doctor, threatens to inject the son of an Englishman, with tetanus, unless Pearson sacrifices his second wife to Koo’s lust, as revenge for Pearson having violated Koo’s betrothed twenty years earlier.  It is hard to argue with Street’s description of Yellow Vengeance as ‘the Chinese rubbish play reduced to a very simple form’, and Cromer noted that it was just the sort of play to which the Chinese consulate was ‘constantly taking exception’.  However, Koo actually turns out to have been bluffing, and is ‘much less a villain than the usual Chinese type’, so Cromer was more easily able to justify his decision: ‘as the Chinaman comes out with all the credit, I can hardly object to the play on either political or moral grounds.’

Rex Ryan may also have written The Twister, another sensational play, which was set in Chang’s Torture Chamber and featured cocaine gangs.  The play was licensed in September 1928 for the Grand Theatre, Brighton, close to where Ryan lived and worked. 

Interestingly, Ryan’s wife was Anne Howard, whose mother was Zoe Beatrice Howard, formerly Redgrave, and related to the famous acting family.  Anne Ryan died in about 1970 and evidently destroyed all of her husband’s papers.

Evelyn Bradley appears to have been known as Rex Ryan from an early period, and as we have seen, his wife called herself Anne Ryan.  Their daughter, Denice, called herself Bradley-Ryan on her marriage certificate.  Denice was born in 1915 and was herself a writer: she published four novels with T Werner Laurie under the name Kay Seaton:  Pawns of Destiny (1947), Tyranny Within (1946), Phantom Fear (1948) and Dark Sanctuary (1949).  A short article on “Kay Seaton” published in the 1948 Christmas edition of the Navy, Army and Air Force Institutes News says that she writes the novels in long-hand and sends them to her father in Hove who has them prepared for manuscript and sent to the publishers.  Rex Ryan’s grandson’s, David Medhurst and Paul Caton, also confirmed the existence of another novel, Tyranny of Virtue (London: Willis, 1925) written under the pseudonym Noel Despard.  Paul Caton and his sister Elspeth run the R.R. Ryan website, which includes lots of genealogical information and some rare photographs: http://rexryan.org/

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Mark Hansom's THE WIZARD OF BERNER'S ABBEY



The Mellifont edition

In my column “Late Reviews” in Wormwood no. 10 (Spring 2008), I reviewed one of Mark Hansom’s novels as follows:

Hansom, Mark.  The Wizard of Berner’s Abbey. (London: Mellifont Press, undated but 1944)
The Wizard of Berner’s Abbey is the second of Mark Hansom’s seven novels, all of which were published by Wright & Brown of London between 1935 and 1939. It came out in May 1935, following the November 1934 publication of The Shadow on the House, an unambitious but readable thriller.  Original Wright & Brown editions of the seven Hansom novels are extremely rare, as are the seven paperback reprints done by Mellifont Press between 1939 and 1951.  According to the British Museum Catalogue, at least some of the Mellifont Press reprints were abridged.  I have not been able to compare the texts of the two editions of The Wizard of Berner’s Abbey, but if the Mellifont edition (which contains approximately fifty-six thousand words in twenty chapters) was abridged, as I suspect (owing to the hazy details of certain aspects of the plot), the cutting was an act of mercy towards the reader.  The Wizard of Berner’s Abbey is a considerable step down from Hansom’s first novel, a descent into hackwork.
            It is the first person narrative of John Richmond, a student of medicine aged twenty-four, who comes unexpectedly to a little Surrey village to visit his cousin, Leonora, who had jilted him two years ago to marry Paul St. Arnaud, a sinister and much older figure completely absorbed in scientific inquiry. John hopes to come to understand why Leonora turned against him and towards the repellant St. Arnaud.  What John discovers is that St. Arnaud believes that his own will is so great that it works in complete independence of his body. St. Arnaud, however, is soon dead and buried, though his influence over his wife, via some sort of mind control, remains. And Leonora unwittingly continues her late husband’s nebulous experiments to create life—these experiments have something to do with the murders of two young women, for evidently brain matter is an essential part of St. Arnaud’s methodology.  Meanwhile John explores St. Arnaud’s library, which contains various occult books, and after reading in one of them John decides that some kind of vampirism is involved with regard to St. Arnaud’s strength of will.
Much of this kind of exposition is padding and deflection. It turns out that St. Arnaud has faked his own death, but is in the end killed in a struggle, leaving John and Leonora to marry.  The reader reaches the final page with relief that this tedious novel, poorly executed and entirely without thrills, is at last finished. 
            Nothing is known of the author. It is possible that the byline is pseudonymous.  Though there are many people with the last name of Hansom in England (particularly in the north), there is no “Mark Hansom” of the appropriate age to be found in the death records for England and Wales from 1938 through 2005.

I am now able to confirm, by comparison with the Wright & Brown original (courtesy of James Doig), that the Mellifont edition of The Wizard of Berner’s Abbey is, as I suspected, significantly abridged, and I am able to make some generalized statements about Mellifont’s process of abridgement, which (presumably) is common with other Mellifont texts.  Basically, what the editor at Mellifont seems to have done is to cut whole paragraphs throughout the book, mostly of narrative description. In some instances, a sequence of paragraphs, including some dialogue, might be excised wholly, even running to a number of pages; but for the most part, it was common for a paragraph or two  to be snipped out here and there in each chapter to reduce the amount of text enough to fit in the standard Mellifont 96-page format.  Additionally, all italics in the original Wright & Brown edition are dropped from the Mellifont.

As an example, here are my notes about the cuts from the twenty chapters of the Wright & Brown edition of The Wizard of Bernard’s Abbey. Very occasionally one sentence might be cut out of a paragraph otherwise retained in the Mellifont edition (marked with a + below), or a sentence from a paragraph otherwise excised might be retained (such instances are marked with a - below).

Chapter I:  6 paragraphs cut
Chapter II: 2 paragraphs cut
Chapter III:  3+ paragraphs cut
Chapter IV:  4 paragraphs cut
Chapter V:  5- paragraphs cut
Chapter VI:  10 paragraphs cut
Chapter VII:  no cuts
Chapter VII: 3 paragraphs cut
Chapter IX:  47 paragraphs cut (including one stretch of 6 pages)
Chapter X:  16 paragraphs cut
Chapter XI:  16 paragraphs cut (including one stretch ~ 3 pages)  
Chapter XII:  18 paragraphs cut
Chapter XII:  17+ paragraphs cut
Chapter XIV:  20 paragraphs cut (+ one new transitional sentence)
Chapter XV:  no cuts
Chapter XVI:  5 paragraphs cut
Chapter XVII:  6- paragraphs cut
Chapter XVIII:  16 paragraphs cut
Chapter XIX:  1 paragraph cut
Chapter XX:   5+ paragraphs cut

I think it’s safe to call the Mellifont edition hacked to pieces! The currently available edition published by Ramble House is reproduced from the Mellifont edition, and thus identically abridged. Potential readers are hereby alerted!   

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

THE OTHER END, R. ELLIS ROBERTS

Wormwoodianaites would know of R. Ellis Roberts through a couple of stories anthologised in Dorothy L. Sayers' sublime Great Short Stories of Detection, Mystery and Horror series.  Surely his scarce collection, The Other End, is deserving of a reprint in these enlightened times.  Here is a contemporary review that appeared in The Bookman in March 1923.


THE OTHER END, By R. Ellis Roberts (Cecil Palmer, 1923)

There is said to be joy among authors when a critic writes a novel or a book of short stories.  “Now,” they say in their hearts, “he will give himself away.  It is easy for him to point out the flaws in our art and tell us how to do it, but he will not find it so easy to demonstrate how it ought to be done." Any such joy will, in this case, be short‑lived, for “The Other End" proves that Mr. Ellis Roberts is as well able to write stories of his own as to criticise those of others. Here, moreover, he has set his hand to a kind of story-telling that is not often practised successfully and achieved a mastery, at times, over the grim, the terrible, the eerie, the bizarre, over the fine, elusive mysteries of the spirit, that challenges comparison with Poe and Hawthorne.

For all the uncanny air that enfolds these stories, the supernatural elements in them are so quietly taken for granted, and am blended with so much of everyday circumstance that even their unrealities are made to seem curiously real. Mr. Roberts paints you a conventional, smiling English landscape, then by gradual, subtle wizardries touches it with secret, twilight terrors. He finds the gods of ancient Rome still haunting the English countryside where their alters and temples had stood; finds the altar magically re‑erected, the sacred fire burning on the lonely hill in the deep of the night, and a strange worshipper, who had seemed by day an ordinary herd‑boy, offering up sacrifice; finds the gods themselves returning to influence mysteriously, tragically, the lives of present‑day men and women.

In "The Great Mother," Hugh Flinders asks his friend: “Would it surprise you to know that the old worship goes on? That hills near here are still sacred to Apollo? That groves are still dedicated to Diana, and woods to Pan? I don't mean stupid revivals like old Taylor's: I mean survivals of the old faith among the old people ‑ people to whom Christ and the saints are less direct of access than earth-stained Pan, gross Priapus, or even Jupiter of the storm. For months now I have resisted and I can resist no longer. I am going to the grove tonight: and I should like you to come too, it you will. Will you?” The amazing happenings that night at the grove ‑ the baffling disappearance of Hugh, the rush of frenzied dancers, with nothing to be heard but the swift padding of many feet, and nothing seen but the long, rank grass beaten down as by a storm of hailstones ‑ the whole thing, with its matter-of-fact ending, which leaves the wonder unexplained, is done with an art, an imaginative cunning that is rare in modern fiction.

These occult influences of the ancient world are potent in “The Hill,” the piteous tragedy of “The Other End,” “The Wind,” “Under the Sun,” and other of the tales; but it is a different wizardry that is practised by the saintly priest, Lascelles in "The Narrow Way," another sort of spirit that haunts the high road in "The Cage." Any summary of the stories would misrepresent them; they depend so much for their effectiveness on the atmosphere in which they are steeped, on little details of character and incident that, subtly touched into them, subdue the reader to a belief in their bizarre happenings. Some are edged with a delicate irony, or have charm as well as mystery and terror; the best show a power of fantasy and a deftness of finish which seem to indicate that Mr. Ellis Roberts has too long given to criticism what was meant for imaginative literature.