Sunday, July 16, 2023

A View (from 1948) on Book Collecting in the 1920s

Publishers are often forgotten in comparison to the books they have published. Yet occasionally a publisher will write a memoir that gives a unique perspective on their books, or on their relationships with their authors, or even about books in general. I like these kind of books, which includes Author Hunting (1934) by Grant Richards, Wide Margins (1942) by George Palmer Putnam, and the initimable Chronicles of Barabbas (1935) by George H. Doran, among others.

I recently read another of these, The Mechanical Angel (1948), by Donald Friede. Friede (1901-1965) was unusually privileged. His father had a successful import and export business, and young Donald traveled around the world three times before he was fourteen. He had the dubious honor of being expelled successively from Harvard, Yale, and then Princeton, before the death of his father, which left the boy very wealthy. He worked desultorily in various jobs before landing in publishing in 1923. He worked a short while for Alfred A. Knopf, and then went to Boni and Liveright (1923-1928), before co-founding Covici-Friede (1928-1938) with the former Chicagoan Pascal Covici. His money had bought him into Boni and Liveright, and while he and Horace Liveright had many successes, they also had some real failures. It was a very interesting publishing house.

In 1948, at the age of 47, Friede published the autobiographical Mechanical Angel, subtitled “His Adventures and Enterprises in the Glittering 1920’s.” The book is oddly organized, and of mixed quality, but three chapters in particular are of especial interest. Two early chapters (“Boy Publisher” and “Angel with Clipped Wings”) center on his time in publishing, and are full of interesting details and anecdotes. In one later chapter (“Young Aesthete”) Friede discusses his book collecting in the 1920s, and it is from this chapter I’d like to share some extracts.

I collected all manner of first editions avidly. And it was not only because the mania for modern first editions was in full flower; I was on the inside and I enjoyed backing my judgment. I did pretty well at it too. I built up a really exciting library that at one time con­tained first editions of just about every important book published since the turn of the century.

Naturally I had among my books complete runs of first editions of Ronald Firbank and Norman Douglas and Aldous Huxley and A. E. Coppard and T. F. Powys and Arthur Machen and H. L. Mencken. No self-respecting collector of the twenties would have been without these books, or without the works of Carl Van Vechten and James Branch Cabell and D. H. Lawrence and Humbert Wolfe. And there were on my groaning shelves first-edition copies of Zuleika Dobson and The Way of All Flesh and Of Hu­man Bondage and the Spoon River Anthology. All of them were very definitely mint copies, and most of them had their original dust wrappers. And in every one of the thou­sands of books that lined my walls from ceiling to floor I had pasted my own bookplate, a reproduction of a cari­cature Covarrubias had made of me in 1924. I thought this the height of sophistication.

But I soon found that collecting first editions in the usual way was merely a matter of watching catalogues, ordering the books I wanted, and then paying for them. That began to pall after a while. It was shortly after I had blocked off one of the doors leading to my kitchen to make room for another series of bookcases that I pulled my first real coup.

I was in the Holliday Bookshop one day in 1924 when I happened to pick up an English edition of a slim volume of poetry by A. A. Milne. When We Were Very Young was the title of the book, and as I read it I became convinced that here was the most delightful book of children's verses since Robert Louis Stevenson's A Child's Garden of Verse, I bought all the copies Holliday would sell me, and then I went around to the other booksellers and bought up their copies too. I found that the English publishers had issued a special autographed edition limited to one hundred cop­ies, and I managed to pick up two copies from unsuspecting American dealers, who sold them to me at the regular price of twelve and a half dollars. And then I cabled to England and got three sets of all the issues of Punch in which these poems had originally appeared. After that I sat back and waited for the market to catch up to me.

It did. I had managed to assemble some twenty copies of the regular English first edition, for which I had paid two dollars apiece. I sold them individually and over a period of time at thirty-five dollars apiece. The limited edi­tions I sold for two hundred and seventy-five dollars each. Even the copies of Punch, tastefully cased, brought up to thirty dollars the set. And the copies of the American first edition, which I had bought just to see what would hap­pen, brought twice to three times their published price.

I may have lost my standing as an amateur aesthete by this move, but I didn't care. My next maneuver was in con­nection with the first two Hemingway books, two privately printed pamphlets in editions of about one hundred copies each. I managed to get five copies of one of them and four of the other one, and I paid the regular price of a dollar and a half apiece for them. Less than five years later I sold them for two hundred and fifty dollars apiece.

And so it went. I combined my interest in new writers I might be able to discover with the even more practical pursuit of securing copies of their earliest work before their more mature creations had made these juvenilia collector's items. I was wrong a great number of times. Whatever happened to Leroy Macleod or to Charles Malam or H. Phelps Putnam or Lancelot de Giberne Sieveking? And who today reads Humbert Wolfe and James Hanley and Stephen Hudson and Robert McAlmon? But I was right often enough to succeed in assembling the most exciting amateur's library I have ever seen. At one point it consisted of almost ten thousand items, including hundreds of fugi­tive pamphlets, a robust collection of erotica all bound in red morocco, uncounted stacks of catalogues, complete runs of the publications of all the great contemporary presses, every art-gallery announcement for almost fifteen years, and almost a thousand issues of the various little maga­zines that were published over that same period of time.

I sold about a third of this collection at a two-session auction at the Anderson Galleries in 1928, a little more than a year before the market crash. The fact that a copy of Will Durant's Story -of Philosophy brought twenty-one dollars is indicative of the prices I obtained for the really important books offered in that sale. And during the course of the next few years I sold my complete runs of Dreiser and James Stephens and Robinson Jeffers and T. S. Eliot and James Joyce and Edna St. Vincent Millay, and all the other complete collections I had managed to assemble, at prices that would seem fantastically high to­day. In 1935 when I sold out all my remaining first edi­tions my library was still important enough for me to be able to sell it to R. H. Macy and Company, who started a rare book shop with my collection as a base and issued a first catalogue that included such items as a signed copy of Elinor Wylie's Jennifer Lorn for fifteen dollars and ninety-seven cents, and a copy of Emperor Jones, illustrated by Alexander King, for six dollars and forty-nine cents.

And yet when I went through the complete list of my collection a short while ago, I could find less than a hun­dred books I would like to own today. The passion for pos­sessions, which was such an important part of the life of the young aesthete of the twenties, long ago became a thing of the past. It began to die with the crash, when we first became aware of the impermanence of everything we had thought of as tunelessly safe. It passed out of our lives com­pletely in the hard days of the depression. And after the uprooting of our lives in the war years it is hard to imagine any of us ever building our lives again around the importance of owning a mint copy of Richard Hughes's Lines Written on First Observing an Elephant Devoured by a Roc, a four-page pamphlet printed for the author by the Golden Cockerel Press in an edition of twenty-five copies, numbered and autographed by the author.

All of the authors named in the second paragraph are familiar to me, as I suspect they are for most readers interested in the time period. But what about the authors named in the seventh paragraph? Aside from Humbert Wolfe, who is also mentioned in the second paragraph---though he is familiar to me primarily as the author of a book review of E.R. Eddison's Mistress of Mistresses ("The Foam-Foot Star-Sparkling" from The Observer, 17 March 1935) that is reproduced in full facsimile on the rear dust-wrapper of the U.S. Dutton edition of the book---I know none of the others. 

If by the time Friede was writing in the mid-1940s they were all forgotten authors, their names have lapsed deeper into obscurity in the eight decades since.  Who knows, and can tell us about these writers?  Any champions out there of Leroy Macleod, Charles Malam,  H. Phelps Putnam, Lancelot de Giberne Sieveking, James Hanley, Stephen Hudson, or Robert McAlmon?  Did they publish anything worth reading today, or have they reached their deserved oblivion? Please enlighten us in the comments.

13 comments:

  1. Hanley, Hudson, McAlmon, and Wolfe are in standard literary histories. I have read Hanley’s The Ocean, excellent. Hudson was a Proust translator; I have his novel Richard Kurt on my iPad. The critic Martin Seymour-Smith (The New Guide to Modern World Literature) was a fan of his fiction. McAlmon was an important figure in the expatriate Paris literary scene of the 1920s; he knew everyone. Wolfe was best known as a poet; he had a long affair with novelist Pamela Frankau.

    Putnam is not in the literary histories, but he did publish the first volume of an intended epic poem. MacLeod was an Indiana-born poet and novelist, and Malam the same but Vermont-born. Sieveking, a Brit, began with that same profile but later became more active in radio and television drama. These last four writers are genuinely obscure, but now I want to see what I can obtain!

    ReplyDelete
  2. For grad school in the mid-90s I read Being Geniuses Together, McAlmon's memoir of English-speaking expat writers living in Paris in the 20s. I remember it being wry, self-deprecating, and sometimes wistful in portraying the scene of more and less famous artists who were very aware of their glamour. It was in the curriculum mostly as literary history of the development of Modernism between the wars.

    McAlmon convenience-married the heiress known as "Bryher," who was a lover of the poet H.D., and he used the payoff to start a press, and his author list was pretty impressive in retrospect (Hemingway, Stein, WCW, H.D., plenty more).

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think McAlmon's memoir "Being Geniuses Together" still has some fans.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It seemed to me that Macleod must have been discussed in Roy W. Meyer’s The Middle Western Farm Novel in the Twentieth Century, so I checked My copy and sure enough, he’s there. Further, I ordered a nice inexpensive copy of his novel The Years of Peace. Interested in Malam’s novel Slow Smoke too, but that one’s a little pricier. Sieveking’s novels The Ultimate Island and A Private Volcano are speculative fiction and might be of most interest to readers of this blog. Putnam achieved a Collected Poems 22 years after his death, in 1979, so that is something.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Didn't Edmund Wilson introduce a volume of H. Phelps Putnam's poetry? I remember seeing this volume remaindered years ago. And, as others have said, I certainly read--probably 40 years ago--McAlmon and Boyle's "Being Beniuses Together." And I know I picked up some book by Lance Sieveking because someone--Bob Knowlton, Bob Eldridge?--recommended it.
    Still, Doug's general point is, of course, true: All these writers are pretty much forgotten.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lance Sieveking's autobiography Eye of the Beholder has a discussion of Aleister Crowley. Sieveking's son became a writer for Fortean Times.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In the early days of my book-collecting I was tremendously pleased with a copy of 'The Cud, Experimental Poems' (1922) that I had found. It had marbled boards, fine watermarked paper, elegant, long-tailed typography, and a paper label for the title. It was a bit chipped and battered, with the spine head peeling away, which was how I could afford it. He wrote other odd books of poems, some described as nonsense verse, but those I didn’t find. Mark

    ReplyDelete
  8. The H. Phelps Putnam Collected Poems was published in 1970 (not 1979 as I mis-typed it), and yes, it had a Foreword by Edmund Wilson. Putnam had passed away in 1948.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have not read Hanley's fiction, but I have read his letters to John Cowper Powys. The two were great friends and Powys admired his work. I believe Anthony Burgess was an admirer as well.

    ReplyDelete
  10. James Hanley is still in demand esp limited editions of his novel ‘Boy.’ Also McAlmon because of the Published in Paris collectors. Sieveking did a book with Bruguiere the photographer that always sells. H his son, Paul, once told me that Crowley started a short lived business with his father, selling a scent for men that was guaranteed to attract women. It went bust, because in fact, it had the opposite effect!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I began my collection of James Hanley's books with an Obelisk Press edition of "Boy" in the controversial dust wrapper. The prices of his novels in fine condition have gone up in value since I began looking for them, so I assume there are other Hanley collectors out there. "Boy" is the most sought after, but an uncomfortable read. "Closed Harbour" is his best novel, in my opinion, though all of his books tend to be rather depressing and deal with loneliness, violence, mental illness, and poverty.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I came into contact with Hanley's as he is sometimes illustrated by (the wonderful) Alan Odle. I have read a few of his books but the one that stands out is his short story ‘The Last Voyage’ issued as a standalone ltd edition in 1931. Its not for the faint of heart (like most of his works) and I think it is one of the bleakest books I have ever read.
    Is that a recommendation? Of sorts...I think...

    ReplyDelete